TRAILING STOP LOSS

FundedNext vs Blue Guardian Futures

Two futures props, one decision. Here’s how FundedNext and Blue Guardian Futures compare on the things that cost you money.

Some links on this page are affiliate links. TrailingStopLoss.com may earn a commission if you sign up through one, at no extra cost to you. It never changes which firms we flag or how we rank them.

Side by side

MetricFundedNextBlue Guardian Futures
Cheapest entry (true cost)$70$82
Profit splitUp to 90% (100% some models)100% on first $15K
Drawdown typeMax overall + daily (by model)EOD trailing
Max drawdownBy model (by size)EOD trailing (by size)
Payout frequencyBi-weekly · fee refunded at first payout14-day cycle (Guardian)
Days to payoutCycle-based: 5–21 days first · 24h5 trading days (Pro/Instant) · 14-day (challenge) · 1–2 day
Min payout$250 (25K/50K) · $500 (100K)$500
Our take: FundedNext is the cheaper way in. Match the drawdown model to how you actually trade and you're set.

FundedNext

Largest review base in prop. 15% reward earned during evaluation.

Visit FundedNext →

Full FundedNext review →

Blue Guardian Futures

100% on first $15K. Eval fee refunded after 4th payout.

Full Blue Guardian Futures review →

Compare more in the comparison tool or the true-cost hub.

FAQ

Is FundedNext or Blue Guardian Futures cheaper?
On cheapest true-cost entry, FundedNext comes in lower. See the table for exact figures.
Which is better, FundedNext or Blue Guardian Futures?
It depends on your asset class and drawdown tolerance. The comparison above lays out cost, drawdown and payouts so you decide on facts.
Compared 2026-06-09. Verify current terms on each firm’s site.